Re: RFC: moving busybox into its own .deb
On Thu Jan 20, 2000 at 03:08:21AM -0500, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> I don't mind the idea of busybox in it's own deb, but I only think
> that's going to delay us quite a bit in the short term; plus, new pkgs
> are no longer accepted into potato.
> Can't we do that for woody instead?
Works for me,
Erik B. Andersen Web: http://www.xmission.com/~andersen/
--This message was written using 73% post-consumer electrons--