Re: fat / v-fat [Re: minix]

To: Goswin Brederlow <goswin.brederlow@student.uni-tuebingen.de>
Cc: Falk Hueffner <falk.hueffner@student.uni-tuebingen.de>, debian-boot@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: fat / v-fat [Re: minix]
From: Adam Di Carlo <adam@onshore.com>
Date: 10 Nov 1999 00:17:55 -0500
Message-id: <oaemdyorgc.fsf@burrito.onshore.com>
In-reply-to: Goswin Brederlow's message of "10 Nov 1999 01:45:37 +0100"
References: <87ln87u3rq.fsf@student.uni-tuebingen.de> <874sevcgy6.fsf@mrvnbook.intern.lin4net.de>

I believe the descision was to use ext2fs for root.bin in all
cases. I'll take out the minix check.  Anywhere minix is used is
probably a bug.

[Correct me if I'm wrong here.]

As for msdos support, yes, the rescue disk image is msdos on i386
anyhow, as well it should be.

-- 
.....Adam Di Carlo....adam@onShore.com.....<URL:http://www.onShore.com/>

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: fat / v-fat [Re: minix]
  - From: Goswin Brederlow <goswin.brederlow@student.uni-tuebingen.de>

References:
- minix
  - From: Falk Hueffner <falk.hueffner@student.uni-tuebingen.de>
- fat / v-fat [Re: minix]
  - From: Goswin Brederlow <goswin.brederlow@student.uni-tuebingen.de>

Prev by Date: Re: ALPHA *is* gonna hold us up (Re: FREEZE RESCHEDULED)
Next by Date: Processed: Re: Processed: retitle 49172
Previous by thread: fat / v-fat [Re: minix]
Next by thread: Re: fat / v-fat [Re: minix]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread