Adam Di Carlo wrote: > > Two questions: > > why 2.2.11 plus stable floppies? What's the point? As soon as one actually exists, I can drop in any stable 2.2 series kernel. > why use 2.1.9 and not the boot-floppies sources from CVS, which fix > many many bugs? Because I got the impression they were somewhat a work in progress and this is intended for a release in a mere 2 months time. -- see shy jo