Bug#31432: marked as done (Default DNS setup should be "another server")
Your message dated 27 Jan 1999 17:36:15 -0500
with message-id <oaiuds5oo0.fsf@burrito.fake>
and subject line bugs closed in boot-floppies ver 2.1.5
has caused the attached bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I'm
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Ian Jackson
(administrator, Debian bugs database)
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Jan 1999 19:14:41 +0000
Received: (qmail 2678 invoked from network); 3 Jan 1999 19:14:41 -0000
Received: from gilgamesh.cse.ucsc.edu (ben@128.114.49.60)
by master.debian.org with SMTP; 3 Jan 1999 19:14:41 -0000
Received: (from ben@localhost) by gilgamesh.cse.ucsc.edu (8.9.0/8.6.12) id LAA31742; Sun, 3 Jan 1999 11:14:33 -0800
Sender: ben@cse.ucsc.edu
To: Adam Di Carlo <adam@onshore.com>
Cc: debian-testing@lists.debian.org, submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Report of slink installation with 2.1.3 disks
References: <199812181732.TAA29178@kiuru.cs.tut.fi> <oak8z4i36h.fsf@burrito.fake>
X-Face: -eDkx0I[vNsajBStK^((#;s#wZr+;?Up|;+Zw5JOl]'fINagA)&i4=$2WI'z4U!h0>;A3ON
RW{7<n^q2ZN?'5kU;qyM@jjhm4T8@O>o6imB12xD.pSBhFoqTuF{>b9[K[R\0h=c]Yy6h_R"=Ogv~9
EsgE,9_6?%yFG'C6'L#JBw%9R*]UqA=|&CCMPsas#<U/%IY{*Q_"%\_4K8UXb0RC@MYR1u?HcjmyMy
4Oji?i':(}%$
From: Ben Gertzfield <che@debian.org>
Date: 03 Jan 1999 11:14:33 -0800
In-Reply-To: Adam Di Carlo's message of "03 Jan 1999 14:09:26 -0500"
Message-ID: <[🔎] yttzp80godi.fsf@gilgamesh.cse.ucsc.edu>
Lines: 26
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.6.27/XEmacs 20.4 - "Emerald"
Package: boot-floppies
Version: 2.1.4
>>>>> "Adam" == Adam Di Carlo <adam@onshore.com> writes:
Heikki> COMMENTS: As someone else already noted, why not have o
Heikki> "Another system will be the DNS server." as default when
Heikki> configuring DNS server? Currently it defaults to o "The
Heikki> system will be its own DNS server."
Adam> I would imagine most machines are stand-alone?
No -- this is one of the most ridiculous parts of dinstall, IMHO.
99.9% of all machines are going to use another machine as a DNS
server. The default in dinstall should *really* be to use another
machine as the DNS server.
I am submitting a bug report to this effect on boot-floppies
with this message.
--
Brought to you by the letters Q and P and the number 15.
"XTC versus Adam Ant -- which one will survive?" -- They Might Be Giants
Debian GNU/Linux -- where do you want to go tomorrow? http://www.debian.org/
I'm on FurryMUCK as Che, and EFNet and YiffNet IRC as Che_Fox.
Reply to: