On Tue, 2021-11-16 at 17:05 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > Quoting Paul Wise (2021-11-16 01:42:02) > > On Mon, 2021-11-15 at 14:08 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > > > > Makes sense to me that the general Blends page lists only those > > > Debian Pure Blends which are stable. > > > > > > Indeed more blending efforts exist at our wiki than the stable ones. > > > > While that makes sense, having a way to direct people interested in > > blends at the not yet stable ones can lead to potential new > > contributors to those blends and to Debian. So it might be reasonable > > to have a section about not yet mature blends that points at a page on > > the wiki listing blends that aren't yet mature or need to be revived. > > Good point :-) I note that we already have a link to the wiki at the bottom of the page, so all that remains is to update the blends wiki page with the relevant information about obsolete or future blends. Anyone can do that, they just need a wiki account and to modify the page. https://wiki.debian.org/DebianPureBlends -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part