[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: blends-doc Appendix B



Hi Andreas,

On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 03:38:11PM +0200, Andreas Glaeser wrote:
> I have sent them already, my message had five attachments, see attachments.

I'm sorry, I simply missed these.
 
> I feel I am not welcomed by the debian-community, nor helped whatsoever.

I feel not really motivated to help if somebody claims not to get help
due to a simple oversight of the one who voluntered to help in a quite
timely manner.  I'm sorry, but may be you should be more patient.

I've checked your files and your debian/changelog file was full of
syntactical errors.  I'd recommend you should use dch to edit this file
to avoid this kind of problems.

Moreover I've added a debian/rules file and a Makefile (both unchanged
from the blends-dev example).  The attached source tarball is the result
of a `make dist`.

As a conclusion I would not subscribe your statement that blends-dev
examples are wrong.  My question whether you *really* want to create
a Blend if you want to create a single metapackage remains.

Hope this helps

     Andreas.

-- 
http://fam-tille.de

Attachment: debian-cucumber_0.1.tar.xz
Description: application/xz


Reply to: