> On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 11:57:52AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > Hi Akshita,
> > On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 02:19:10PM +0530, Akshita Jha wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 3:50 PM, Andreas Tille <firstname.lastname@example.org
> > > >
> > > > BTW, it somehow seems the trouble with not importet references for
> > > > prospective packages remains. It seems to happen only on udd.debian.org
> > > > (not on my local clone).
> > >
> > > I am sorry but I don't completely understand the issue. The publications
> > > information for prospective packages is being added to tasks pages .
> > I think the problem is that there are several jobs dealing with the
> > bibref table. If not all jobs are finished and the tasks pages are
> > created the table is incomplete. My temporary hack was to delay the
> > tasks pages creation two hours later seemed to have worked but that's
> > not a solution. The proper way would be to merge
> > bibref+ftpnew+blends-prospective all in one transaction to make sure
> > that at all times the information is complete.
> > > > I do not understand this issue at all but I
> > > > think we should really put bibref + ftpnew + blends-prospective in a
> > > > single transaction which makes sense in any case.
> > > >
> > >
> > > I am unable to clearly understand what you mean by a single transaction. Do
> > > you mean merging the scripts bibref_gatherer.py, ftpnew_gatherer.py and
> > > blends_prospective_gatherer.py ?
> > Yes.
> > > Can you please elaborate a little on this ?
> > Was my explanation above precise enough?
> > > I am sorry for the late response. I'll work on this and importing
> > > prospective package information at the earliest.
> > No need to sorry - I was delaying things on my end as well...
> > Kind regards
> > Andreas.
> > > 
> > > https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/blends/website.git/commit/?id=c9481c41ebb3c790ba8f73e10b1639dee221e7ab
> > --
> > http://fam-tille.de