Re: Motivation to work on Blends
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 06:34:55PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> >
> > That's not my main problem. My problem is that the information
> > dropped in "by chance". I was criticising a lack of announcement +
> > discussion. I have no problems with alternatives.
>
> Thanks for clarifying that now: I totally missed in your previous posts
> that lack of announcement-discussion was what you ciritcised.
https://lists.debian.org/debian-blends/2014/10/msg00038.html
"I admit I consider it a bit strange to anounce it that way. ...
Not to say that we had a GSoC
last year to rewrite blends-dev and all people reading here should have
noticed the discussion and could have suggested their wanted features.
I'm not against "friendly competition" - but staying silent when the
chance for cooperation is given comes quite unexpected to me."
https://lists.debian.org/debian-blends/2014/10/msg00042.html
"Your statement sounded as if this discussion only makes sense
if different tools exist. ...
I admit that I remain
perplexed if running a GSoC project with the goal to redesign a tool
does not trigger any discussion since only an alternative tool is worth
discussing according your point of view."
"I'm just astonished / speachless / perlexed if people are not
communicating their feature requests. And I admit that the reason
you gave that communication only happens if there is an alternative
implementation makes me shaking my head even stronger than a simple
lack of interest / time."
"At least I'd regard it sensible to discuss on the list - which is
what I intended to say."
"So
I keep on failing to understand what exactly was stoping you to drop a
note here about what you are doing."
"Could you please be so kind to enlighten the
list about this?"
Sorry if my ways to criticise missing / ask for communication is a bit
cryptic. If I next time will mumble something like this I'm doing this
since I was lacking information via open communication.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
Reply to: