Re: Bug#758116: Please be verbose whether you would like to get your Blend promoted by tasksel
Hi Per,
On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 02:50:19PM +0200, Per Andersson wrote:
> >
> > I think it is not a measure for a sequence but rather a measure whether
> > a Blend should be included or not.
>
> Possibly, but the fact is that only three blends have more than zero installs.
> Better then to have some criterion for inclusion, possibly as simple as
> having a $BLEND-tasks package for tasksel.
Ahhh, I see you are refering to the third data column (vote). Well, I
think popcon simply is failing for metapackages. You usually do not
vote for the tasks package but rather for the installed depedencies,
right?
> > chance to prominently be shown in the installer might be a motivation
> > for multimedia maintainers to review the tasks (both team members who
> > previously commited to Git in CC).
> >
> >> >> $ curl -s 'http://popcon.debian.org/by_inst' | grep -e '-tasks '
> >> >> 10053 education-tasks 983 355 448 173 7 (Debian Edu Developers)
> >> >> 10929 science-tasks 830 76 660 58 36 (Debian Science Team)
> >> >> 11000 junior-tasks 818 0 0 0 818 (Debian Junior)
> >> >> 15895 plasma-widget-smooth-tasks 370 71 285 14 0 (Salvo Rinaldi)
> >> >> 17234 gis-tasks 305 0 0 0 305 (Debian Gis Project)
> >> >> 17279 med-tasks 304 26 250 11 17 (Debian Med Packaging Team)
> >> >> 21947 multimedia-tasks 166 0 0 0 166 (Debian Multimedia Maintainers)
> >> >> 32922 games-tasks 57 0 0 0 57 (Debian Games Team)
> >> >> 34392 debichem-tasks 50 0 0 0 50 (Debichem Team)
> >> >> 35076 ezgo-tasks 47 0 0 0 47 (Debain Ezgo Packaging Team)
> >> >> 41997 tine20-tasks 27 13 11 1 2 (Not in sid)
> >> >> 69244 site-tasks 5 0 0 0 5 (Not in sid)
> >> >> 93698 agenda-tasks 1 1 0 0 0 (Not in sid)
> >> >
> >> > (column 3 is install count among active popcon users; descending order)
> >
> > I think both criterions are not as objective as alphabetic order. Think of
> > our language selection menu? Should we try to rank it according to the user
> > base of a certain language or the translation status? I think this gets a
> > clear "no".
>
> Very good point. I agree with this of course.
:-)
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
Reply to: