Re: Some possible improvements (fwd)
> > now that i'm having a look at cdd-install-helper, i've seen that every
> > <dep>.txt on the documentation dir gets an entry on the menu, even if
> > there's already a "manual" entry (one handwritten on the menu dir).
> Do you mean by "manual" an entry you created in your ~/.menu directory?
>
that's right :)
> > But i also noticed that no .html can appear on the menu as .txt do.
> Currently not but perhaps it would be the best idea to switch completely
> to html.
>
well, IMHO it would be better to have both options
[...]
> > Anyway, i've noticed that you are using pager to see the txt's, but it
> might
> > be better to use sensible-pager instead of pager, as the former lets the
> > user define the PAGER variable, and the other uses debian's alternatives
> > system (only ~modifiable~ - is this the correct spelling? - by root, i
> > think), and the same could go to sensible-editor vs. view (why use view
> > instead of pager when the hint is different from the title? in my system
> > view is vim) and (maybe) sensible-browser vs. www-browser.
> I put this onto the TODO list. It's a good idea.
>
great!
Now onto the other mail i sent to Andreas :)
Is there any plan to add Gnome/KDE menu systems support?
Dont't know, as i see there could be 2 possible options:
- Use separated files for each menu (one for Debian's menu, one for Gnome
and another for KDE), each one on it's own format (maybe on dirs 'menu',
'menu-gnome' and 'menu-kde' ...)
- Use a "standard" format and translate each entry to every "particular"
format (so only one menu file should be written and all three could be
automatically generated by cdd-dev)
What do you think?
Read you
--
+++ Jetzt WLAN-Router für alle DSL-Einsteiger und Wechsler +++
GMX DSL-Powertarife zudem 3 Monate gratis* http://www.gmx.net/dsl
Reply to: