|| On Wed, 30 Jun 2004 21:48:41 +0200 (CEST)
|| Andreas Tille <tillea@rki.de> wrote:
at> On Wed, 30 Jun 2004, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> But this will be used to build the cdd-* packages. Not to built the
>> #CDD#-doc package. If the user need one documentation package he
>> should choose what he like to use.
>>
>> cdd-doc can use sgml and med-doc, built using cdd-dev, latex. I don't
>> see any problem on it.
at> Well, the problem is IMHO the following: Currently med-doc uses
at> SGML with linuxdoc DTD. A (currently) imaginary np-doc package uses
at> XML with any DTD and a (currently) imaginary jr-doc package uses
at> for instance debiandoc-sgml. If cdd-dev should provide a Build-Depends
at> from the doc tool we now would have to build depend from at least three
at> different packages (probably even more). This really sucks. This can
at> be fixed by either
I doesn't agree with it.
cdd-dev is a binary package and this doesn't build-depends of any
package. The source package cdd build-depends of the doc tool.
If some maintainer what to *use* cdd-dev this does't need your your
build-deps installed, only deps. Your packages then will build-depend
of cdd-dev and of one doc tool, if need.
This is what I see. Is wrong?
--
O T A V I O S A L V A D O R
---------------------------------------------
E-mail: otavio@debian.org UIN: 5906116
GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: 49A5F855
Home Page: http://www.freedom.ind.br/otavio
---------------------------------------------
"Microsoft gives you Windows ... Linux gives
you the whole house."
Attachment:
pgprU8BPQowBN.pgp
Description: PGP signature