Re: Math, BLAS/LAPACK m4 checks
Junichi Uekawa wrote:
This makes sense. I think it only needs to conflict with blas (and
lapack and lapack99), since there is no file conflict with atlas, as
opposed to conflicting with blas2 (and lapack2). I'll give that a try.
Adam C Powell IV <email@example.com> immo vero scripsit:
BTW, I'd like to have my cxml package provide blas2 and/or lapack2, but
can't quite figure how to do that. If I make symlinks from
/usr/lib/libblas2.so etc. then that's not a problem at build-time, but
what about runtime? Do I need to symlink /usr/lib/libblas.so.2 to
libcxml.so? In that case, will it conflict with blas and lapack?
You probably don't need to symlink /usr/lib/libblas2.so in your
It should be possible to provide libblas.so.2 symlink to
libcxml.so, conflicting and providing blas2 (I think),
so that libcxml.so is used as a replacement for "real" libblas.so.2,
and magically all apps linked against libblas.so.2 will run with
I don't think it will be feasible to provide libblas2-dev or
liblapack2-dev, because I'd need to change the soname of cxml, which
provides a lot more than just the BLAS/LAPACK. So I'll stick with blas2
and lapack2, and not even try to symlink libblas2.so.
GPG fingerprint: D54D 1AEE B11C CE9B A02B C5DD 526F 01E8 564E E4B6
Welcome to the best software in the world today cafe!