Re: PETSc Debian package switch to lam?
On Mon, Jun 25, 2001 at 01:52:52PM +0200, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> >> Junichi Uekawa <dancer@netfort.gr.jp> writes:
>
> > Myrinet is coming very rapidly, and I think myrinet should be
> > considered. Well, that's my personal impression. (We have a cluster
> > with myrinet here).
>
Let's not waste the lam implementation. It can run on a multitude of
comms layers, so if myrinet gets widespread they will eventually
support it. I'd like to see how well it performs on the VIA...
The cplant software also uses mpich.
Thanks,
--
Eray Ozkural (exa) <erayo@cs.bilkent.edu.tr>,
Comp. Sci. Dept., Bilkent University, Ankara
www: http://www.cs.bilkent.edu.tr/~erayo
GPG public key fingerprint: 360C 852F 88B0 A745 F31B EA0F 7C07 AE16 874D 539C
Reply to: