Re: AFS
>>>>> "Tim" == Tim Sailer <sailer@bnl.gov> writes:
Tim> AFS had used only krb4, but there were ports to krb5 (from
Tim> nrl.gov), and now with openAFS, they are 'mainstream'.
Got a (real/live) URL for these two? Sure, I could go look, but I'm
lazy :)
Tim> I'd take a serious look at AFS if you want clustering and/or
Tim> WAN filesystems.
I was 'forced' to use NFS on external machines, mostly because that was
the easiest way to solve the problem. With a lot of IP-chains rules, I felt
'reasonable safe' but I still got a number of attacks (non successful luckily).
I would feel much safer if I could get a Network FS that is DESIGNED for
this use (which you say AFS is).
--
Turbo __ _ Debian GNU Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just
^^^^^ / /(_)_ __ _ ___ __ selective about who its friends are
/ / | | '_ \| | | \ \/ / Debian Certified Linux Developer
_ /// / /__| | | | | |_| |> < Turbo Fredriksson turbo@tripnet.se
\\\/ \____/_|_| |_|\__,_/_/\_\ Stockholm/Sweden
--
FBI plutonium quiche pits [Hello to all my fans in domestic
surveillance] North Korea attack domestic disruption Honduras PLO
president 767 nuclear explosion munitions
[See http://www.aclu.org/echelonwatch/index.html for more about this]
Reply to:
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: AFS
- From: Adam C Powell IV <hazelsct@mit.edu>
- References:
- Re: AFS
- From: Matthew Palmer <mjp16@ieee.uow.edu.au>
- Re: AFS
- From: Turbo Fredriksson <turbo@bayour.com>
- Re: AFS
- From: Tim Sailer <sailer@bnl.gov>