>> Camm Maguire <camm@enhanced.com> writes:> Greetings! Personally, I think the debian-beowulf list should suit
> fine. There isn't much traffic on this list in general, and I don't
> see why mpi et. al. related questions need be cross-posted to
> infrastructures.Seconded.
Agreed. debian-beowulf list is okay. But if that other list is already
well
organized and has lots of subscribers, we could subscribe to it as
well
anyway.
> As one reader of this list, my primary interest in this discussion
> would be in making maintenance of Debian clusters easier. Long
> discussions about Solaris and other OS's would not be of interest to
> me personally.Agreed, but some people are working on possibly very non etherogeneous
clusters, with a mix of architectures and OSes (Debian + somethig
else :-)
Yep, but if we want to make Debian *the* distro for admins,
then I think we
should think about those as well.
Marcelo--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-beowulf-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
-- ++++-+++-+++-++-++-++--+---+----+----- --- -- - - + Eray "eXa" Ozkural . . . . . . + CS, Bilkent University, Ankara ^ . o . . | mail: erayo@cs.bilkent.edu.tr . ^ . .