Re: Packaged MPICH 1.2.0 for Potato
In 17 Jul 2000 14:35:38 -0400, de profundis Camm Maguire <email@example.com> cum veritate scripsit
camm> Greetings! Good to hear about your efforts. Are you taking this
camm> package over from Mark Brown? I know he had offered the package up
camm> for adoption. If so, please let me introduce myself
I think I am taking the package over from Mark Brown...
camm> You might want to look at the alternative setup in the
camm> install scripts of the old package, if you haven't already. Anyway,
camm> I'd be happy to discuss any ideas you may have for mpi on Debian.
I have not yet tested it, yet, but it should work on the version I
packaged too... ?? I just have realized that update-alternatives doesn't seem to be
doing as I wanted it to be doing.
Well, I think I need to look at it more.
First thing that comes to my mind will be to make a section
main/beowulf (or a better name would be more helpful). mpich is in main/devel and lam is in main/libs. That
doesn't help much, does it? Unless a newbie magically knows about
mpich or lam, he would have so much difficulty finding the
University: firstname.lastname@example.org Netfort: email@example.com
dancer, a.k.a. Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
Dept. of Knowledge Engineering and Computer Science, Doshisha University.
... Long Live Free Software, LIBERTAS OMNI VINCIT.