On Fri, Oct 08, 1999 at 01:32:27PM +1000, Drake Diedrich wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 08, 1999 at 02:19:47AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 07, 1999 at 11:28:49AM +1000, Drake Diedrich wrote:
> > > Another change is the /etc/alternatives/pvm-rsh alternative link. PVM
> > > can now use ssh (and krsh presumably) to initiate pvmd connections.
> > Could you perhaps change the name to "beowulf-rsh" or something so that
> I was hoping the remote shells would provide the alternatives themselves,
> and I could then point pvm-rsh to that. I was expecting the rsh-client
> breakup to include a remote-shell alternative. Note that there is no
Of course, this is the most sensible thing. I was kind of hoping that
this was a nice workaround. Since it seems to be about the same as I
managed to come up with, I guess I'll not bother.
> /usr/bin/pvm-rsh file. It's /usr/lib/pvm3/bin/rsh. If you use it you'll
> need to add a dependency on pvm no matter which directory I put it in. You
> probably don't want to do this. I don't even like doing it, I just got
> desparate. :) I suggest reassigning the bug to rsh-client and ssh so that
> at least it's not counted against you. Eventually they'll cave in and make
> us a link.
Perhaps I should reassign it to severity important like it was when it
was submitted too :-) .
--
Mark Brown mailto:broonie@tardis.ed.ac.uk (Trying to avoid grumpiness)
http://www.tardis.ed.ac.uk/~broonie/
EUFS http://www.eusa.ed.ac.uk/societies/filmsoc/
Attachment:
pgpD7bVHJv6G8.pgp
Description: PGP signature