On Tue, 28 Oct 2025 08:11:19 +0000
Micha Lenk <debian-backports@lists.debian.org> wrote:
The backport itself looks good, but is eligible for suite
bookworm-backports (the version you backported is available in
trixie). Please upload to that suite instead.
I went with bookworm-backports-sloppy here because the backport of
python-rarfile is required by sabnzbdplus >=4.5.4 (as mentioned in my
message to the mailing list yesterday), which itself can only ever go
into -sloppy as trixie is at 4.5.0.
For my understanding: can a maintainer assume that any user enabling
*-backport-sloppy also has *-backports enabled? In other words, can
packages in -backports-sloppy depend on things available only via the
regular -backports for the same Debian release, along the lines of
how that works for contrib and main?