On Tue, 28 Oct 2025 08:11:19 +0000 Micha Lenk <debian-backports@lists.debian.org> wrote: > The backport itself looks good, but is eligible for suite > bookworm-backports (the version you backported is available in > trixie). Please upload to that suite instead. Hi Micha, I went with bookworm-backports-sloppy here because the backport of python-rarfile is required by sabnzbdplus >=4.5.4 (as mentioned in my message to the mailing list yesterday), which itself can only ever go into -sloppy as trixie is at 4.5.0. For my understanding: can a maintainer assume that any user enabling *-backport-sloppy also has *-backports enabled? In other words, can packages in -backports-sloppy depend on things available only via the regular -backports for the same Debian release, along the lines of how that works for contrib and main?
Attachment:
pgpvZ02TtBzU2.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature