Re: Unsing stable-backports as an ugprade path to stable+1
On Mon, 24 Jan 2022, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> > too. Ceph is not the only part of Debian where something like that would
> Correct. And that's probably the path I will choose as well: yet another
> unofficial Debian repository in the debian.net namespace, for people to use as
But these aren’t part of Debian any more then…
> upgrade path.
Hmm. At least put in a preinst into the normal package that refuses
upgrading from a version where upgrading from is not supported. Not
too happy with that though, as it’ll break upgrades between stable
releases :/ (does anyone know of a better version, except removing
ceph from bookworm?)
bye,
//mirabilos
--
Infrastrukturexperte • tarent solutions GmbH
Am Dickobskreuz 10, D-53121 Bonn • http://www.tarent.de/
Telephon +49 228 54881-393 • Fax: +49 228 54881-235
HRB AG Bonn 5168 • USt-ID (VAT): DE122264941
Geschäftsführer: Dr. Stefan Barth, Kai Ebenrett, Boris Esser, Alexander Steeg
****************************************************
/⁀\ The UTF-8 Ribbon
╲ ╱ Campaign against Mit dem tarent-Newsletter nichts mehr verpassen:
╳ HTML eMail! Also, https://www.tarent.de/newsletter
╱ ╲ header encryption!
****************************************************
Reply to: