[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: bind9 9.16.13-1~bpo10+1 and sysV init scripts bug



Whoops, sorry, of course it is 9.16.13-1~bpo10+1


> On 17. May 2021, at 07:36, Philip Wyett <philip.wyett@kathenas.org> wrote:
> 
> On Mon, 2021-05-17 at 07:11 +0200, Aleksandar Ivanisevic wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> bind9 9.16.13-1~bpo10+1 from buster-backports installs sysV init script in
>> /etc.init.d/named (as well as /etc/default/named) and turns it on alongside the already existing
>> systemd unit. This results in systemd unit failing to start after reboot, but named is still OK
>> and running because it was started by sysV legacy mechanism. Had me puzzled quite a bit ;)
>> 
>> Also, (not sure if this is a bug or a feature), even after downgrading back to stable bind9,
>> those two files are still there and still show as installed by bind9
>> 
>> $ dpkg -l bind9
>> Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
>>> Status=Not/Inst/Conf-files/Unpacked/halF-conf/Half-inst/trig-aWait/Trig-pend
>>> / Err?=(none)/Reinst-required (Status,Err: uppercase=bad)
>>>> / Name           Version                      Architecture Description
>> +++-==============-============================-============-=================================
>> ii  bind9          1:9.11.5.P4+dfsg-5.1+deb10u5 amd64        Internet Domain Name Server
>> $ dpkg -L bind9 | fgrep named
>> …
>> /etc/init.d/named
>> /etc/default/named
>> 
>> regards,
> 
> Hi,
> 
> This package version you refer to is not in buster-backports, but buster/stable.
> 
> Regards
> 
> Phil
> 
> -- 
> *** Playing the game for the games own sake. ***
> 
> WWW: https://kathenas.org
> 
> Twitter: @kathenasorg
> 
> Instagram: @kathenasorg
> 
> IRC: kathenas
> 
> GPG: 724AA9B52F024C8B



Reply to: