[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: libreoffice 7 backport is requirung openclipart backport



Hi!

See ` apt-cache show  libreoffice-common/buster-backports`
Conflicts: …openclipart-libreoffice (<= 1:0.18+dfsg-17)…

So installations with installed openclipart support couldn't be upgraded due to the missing backport of openclipart.

Clearly to solve this issue openclipart in buster-backports has to be upgraded to solve the issue finally.
I filled this report against libreoffice because here the unsatisfied dependency is introduced.

For myself I backported openclipart locally from bullseye without any applied changes.
But for ordinary debian users the current situation means that the old libreoffice 6 package will still stay forever.
Which is bad, because also no security updates will be installed before openclipart is updated in buster-backports.

Feel free to reassign to another team, if that team solves the dependency conflict.

Best Regards,

H.-Dirk Schmitt



Am Sonntag, den 30.08.2020, 09:28 +0200 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
Hi,


if at all, this would be a bug in openclipart since openclipart needs
the update. No bug in LO.


Am 27.08.20 um 20:35 schrieb H.-Dirk Schmitt:
Package: libreoffice
Version: 1:7.0.1~rc1-1~bpo10+1
Severity: serious
if at all, this would be a bug in openclipart since openclipart needs
the update. No bug in LO.
The newly available backport of libreoffice 7 in buster requires an updated
openclipart package not available in buster and buster-backports.

The following packages have unmet dependencies:
 libreoffice-common : Breaks: openclipart-libreoffice (<= 1:0.18+dfsg-17) but
1:0.18+dfsg-15 is to be installed

No, it doesn't.

It *conflicts* against the old one, it doesn't *require* the new one.

(Reason is 
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=964261
)


And openclipart is pure data, you can just install it from testing
yourself.


Otherwise you can ask for openclipart to be backported,. but given that
openclipart does not have a maintainer...

I will for sure not do it myself.


Regards,


Rene



Reply to: