[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

stretch-backport for cups-pdf 3.0.1-5



Hi,

I am requesting a stretch-backport for cups-pdf.  Stretch(stable) repos have cups-pdf 2.6.1-22.  Buster(testing) and Sid have cups-pdf 3.0.1-5 in repos. Cups-pdf 3.0.1-5 fixes a bug that again allows for the selecting of text to copy/paste that is ungarbled. Bug report: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=658004l

Cups-pdf is great for producing quality PDFs from applications that don't have the capability of exporting to PDF and is provided by printer-driver-cups-pdf.

$ rmadison printer-driver-cups-pdf
printer-driver-cups-pdf | 2.6.1-15      | oldstable          | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x
printer-driver-cups-pdf | 2.6.1-15      | oldstable-kfreebsd | kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386
printer-driver-cups-pdf | 2.6.1-22      | stable             | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips, mips64el, mipsel, ppc64el, s390x
printer-driver-cups-pdf | 3.0.1-5       | testing            | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips, mips64el, mipsel, ppc64el, s390x
printer-driver-cups-pdf | 3.0.1-5       | unstable           | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, hurd-i386, i386, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mips64el, mipsel, ppc64el, s390x

$ rmadison cups-pdf
cups-pdf   | 2.6.1-6       | oldoldstable       | source, amd64, armel, armhf, i386, ia64, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, s390x, sparc
cups-pdf   | 2.6.1-15      | oldstable          | source, amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x
cups-pdf   | 2.6.1-15      | oldstable-kfreebsd | source, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386
cups-pdf   | 2.6.1-22      | stable             | source, amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips, mips64el, mipsel, ppc64el, s390x
cups-pdf   | 3.0.1-5       | testing            | source
cups-pdf   | 3.0.1-5       | unstable           | source
cups-pdf   | 3.0.1-5       | unstable-debug     | source


Thanks,
Rich

Reply to: