[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: broken dependency for sssd in Wheezy's backports



Hi Harald,

On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 5:20 PM, Harald Dunkel <harald.dunkel@aixigo.de> wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> The sssd in Wheezy's backport depends upon libpwquality >= 1.2.2,
> but this version was never backported to Wheezy, AFAICS.
>

Which package do you see that depends on libpwqality? I tried to
install sssd from wheezy-backports and appears to have no problem:

# apt-get install -t wheezy-backports sssd
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
The following extra packages will be installed:
  libc-ares2 libcollection2 libdbus-1-3 libdhash1 libexpat1 libffi5
  libglib2.0-0 libini-config2 libldb1 libnl-3-200 libnl-route-3-200 libnspr4
  libnss3 libpath-utils1 libpcre3 libpopt0 libpython2.7 libref-array1
  libsss-idmap0 libtalloc2 libtdb1 libtevent0 mime-support python
  python-minimal python-sss python2.7 python2.7-minimal sssd-common sssd-krb5
  sssd-krb5-common sssd-ldap sssd-proxy
Suggested packages:
  python-doc python-tk python2.7-doc binfmt-support apparmor sssd-tools
  libsasl2-modules-ldap
Recommended packages:
  dbus libglib2.0-data shared-mime-info file bind9-host libnss-sss libpam-sss
  libsss-sudo libsasl2-modules-gssapi-mit libsasl2-modules-gssapi-heimdal
  ldap-utils
The following NEW packages will be installed:
  libc-ares2 libcollection2 libdbus-1-3 libdhash1 libexpat1 libffi5
  libglib2.0-0 libini-config2 libldb1 libnl-3-200 libnl-route-3-200 libnspr4
  libnss3 libpath-utils1 libpcre3 libpopt0 libpython2.7 libref-array1
  libsss-idmap0 libtalloc2 libtdb1 libtevent0 mime-support python
  python-minimal python-sss python2.7 python2.7-minimal sssd sssd-common
  sssd-krb5 sssd-krb5-common sssd-ldap sssd-proxy
0 upgraded, 34 newly installed, 0 to remove and 9 not upgraded.
Need to get 11.5 MB of archives.
After this operation, 33.6 MB of additional disk space will be used.
Do you want to continue [Y/n]?

Cheers,
Aron


Reply to: