[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#878926: Users of btrfs-progs from stretch-backports will need a bpo of btrbk (>= 0.25.1)

On Thu, 02 Nov 2017, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:

> Dear Backports Team,
> I'm not sure if Axel Burri is interested in maintaining a
> stretch-backport of his package btrbk (I asked, an am waiting for a
> reply).  As part of my continuing updates of a btrfs-progs backport I
> plan to upload a version >> 4.12 (specifically 4.13.3); however,
> btrbk-0.24.0-1 in stretch is incompatible with btrfs-progs (>= 4.12).
> Btrbk was not in the archive when I began maintaining a
> jessie-backport of btrfs-progs, and I have no interest in maintaining
> a bpo of btrbk.  Would someone on the team please consider maintaining
> one if Axel isn't interested?
No, thanks I am out and I guess rhonda is too. 


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: