[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: puredata_0.48.0-1~bpo9+1_amd64.changes is NEW

On 08/16/2017 05:11 PM, Debian FTP Masters wrote:
> binary:puredata is NEW.
> binary:puredata is NEW.
> source:puredata is NEW.
> Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action
> from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good
> OpenPGP signature and file hashes are valid), so please be patient.

so i "accidentally" uploaded a package to stretch-backports just after i
uploaded it to sid (i was just in a packaging frenzy, and did not
consider the backports policy).


however, now that this has happened:
would it be acceptable to just let the package linger in backports-NEW
until it has hit testing?


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply to: