Re: Latest openssl 1.0.2 for Jessie backports
On 2017-06-28 21:14:37 [+0200], Alexander Wirt wrote:
> > AFAIK, there was no complaint on this package. Updating it to the
> > version actually in stretch seems a good idea. Not allowing it because
> > the source package was renamed seems a bit far-fetched.
> I rejected it because I didn't detected that it got renamed.
>
> Thats the point of talking about such things before uploading.
I am sorry about this, I did not think about it.
In my initial message in this thread [0] I tried to explain why I can't
upload openssl1.0 as-is. May I upload the rejected package or are there
any changes you would like to see?
[0] [🔎] 20170628114313.dvmdmnmkmekris34@breakpoint.cc">https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/[🔎] 20170628114313.dvmdmnmkmekris34@breakpoint.cc
> Alex
Sebastian
Reply to: