> Yes, that's been known for a while. The -4 revision in Stretch has been > patched to allow builds on at least up to the 4.9 kernel, and is a > simple backport to Jessie. I am not familiar with backports standard operating procedure, but if it's been known for a while and is a simple backport, why is it still an outstanding issue? What do I need to do to move this forward? Thanks, Corey