Hey, there is a very rough answer on backports list: NO Best regards, sandro PS: can somebody change the behavior of this list to be not moderated? -- Am Sonntag, 13. November 2016, 18:25:23 CET schrieb Sandro Knauß: > Hey, > > at the moment we have roundcube 1.1.5+dfsg.1-1~bpo8+1 in backports and > 1.2.2+dfsg.1-1 in testing/unstable. We have big issues getting 1.2.X to > backports, because this would mean, that we would have to add multiple new > packages in backports. > Upstreams supports both versions with updates aka 1.1.X and 1.2.X, these > updates for 1.1 branch are only security/bugfixing releases. > > So we thought, that it makes sense to update the 1.1-branch packages in > backports and have the 1.2-branch in testing/unstable only. > > That's why I ask for an exception for roundcube to stick to the 1.1-branch > for backports and update this to the newest 1.1.X version. Currently > Guilhem packaged 1.1.6 for backports. > https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-roundcube/roundcube.git/commit/?h=jessie > -backports > > Best Regards, > > sandro
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.