On 15 Jul 2016, at 6:26 AM, Tilo Werner <tilo@moosbee.de> wrote: > > Am 14.07.2016 um 15:07 schrieb Ben Hutchings: >> On Thu, 2016-07-14 at 00:18 +0200, Tilo Werner wrote: >>> But what it not supports is AUFS. Anyway, one could use DEVICEMAPPER >>> (direct-lvm) instead. Which is nowadays the preferred way. Note: AUFS is >>> the original one and has the same recommendation. >> [...] >> >> aufs was dropped in favour of overlayfs. And I read that Docker can >> also use overlayfs through the overlay storage driver. > > I've stopped reading about this storage backend after: > > Therefore caution should be taken before using it in production Docker > environments. [1] > > But I will give it a try, because this is the only solution to benefit > from all features of docker. Hi Tilo and Ben. We have had a lot of success (and very few problems) running overlayfs in production and also for general development. As far as I can tell it's pretty stable. Tim.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail