Re: jlapack_0.8~dfsg-3~bpo8+1_amd64.changes REJECTED
On Thu, 07 Jul 2016, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 05:01:58PM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> > On Thu, 07 Jul 2016, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > > jlapack (0.8~dfsg-3~bpo8+1) jessie-backports; urgency=medium
> > >
> > > * Rebuild for jessie-backports.
> > >
> > > -- Andreas Tille <tille@debian.org> Fri, 01 Jul 2016 22:52:39 +0200
> > jlapack | 0.8~dfsg-1 | stable/contrib | source
> > jlapack | 0.8~dfsg-3 | testing | source
> >
> > There are no user visible changes in the packages that justify a backport.
>
> The point is that the package was moved to main and users in Jessie who
> might exclude non-free can use it now. There will be two other package
> in the queue which also have no source changes. The final target
> beast-mcmc is now in main as well and if the preconditions are in
> stable/contrib I would need to backport from main to contrib which makes
> no sense.
Thats not a reason for a backport.
Alex
Reply to: