Re: jlapack_0.8~dfsg-3~bpo8+1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi Alexander,
I can't parse this. Changelog was (or should have been)
jlapack (0.8~dfsg-3~bpo8+1) jessie-backports; urgency=medium
* Rebuild for jessie-backports.
-- Andreas Tille <tille@debian.org> Fri, 01 Jul 2016 22:52:39 +0200
Anything wrong about this?
Kind regards
Andreas.
On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 02:02:46PM +0000, Alexander Wirt wrote:
>
> I see nothing in the changelog that warrants a backport.
>
> ===
>
> Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
> your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
> concerns.
>
>
--
http://fam-tille.de
Reply to: