[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: qupzilla for wheezy-backports



* bruno zanetti <bzanetti00@gmail.com> [2015-02-10 21:25:36 CET]:
> > W: qupzilla source: changelog-should-mention-nmu
> > W: qupzilla source: source-nmu-has-incorrect-version-number
> 1.6.6-2~bpo70+1
> 
> I thought these warnings were relevant for uploads to stable (or maybe
> testing/sid). I may be wrong but many backports are nmu but I usually see
> ~bpoXX+Y not the nmu suffix in the version string.

 Often enough people just add themself to the Uploaders field in
debian/control so that the package also appears on their DDPO page on
https://qa.debian.org/developer.php - and with that those warnings won't
appear anymore.  If you don't see a need for that you can ignore those
warnings.

> 2015-02-09 17:24 GMT+01:00 Georges Khaznadar <georges.khaznadar@free.fr>:
> > When I rebuild your package, here is Lintian's complaint:
> >
> > W: qupzilla source: changelog-should-mention-nmu
> > W: qupzilla source: source-nmu-has-incorrect-version-number 1.6.6-2~bpo70+1
> >
> > About the NMU: either you explicitely mention it, and use some other
> > numbering scheme, like .6.6-2~bpo70+0.1, or I must list myself as the
> > last modifier in debian/changelog, so it is no longer a NMU.

 Erm, no, please do not suggest to use some NMU versioning with 0.1 for
backports because of that warning.  That's not a useful approach and not
needed.

 So long,
Rhonda
-- 
Fühlst du dich mutlos, fass endlich Mut, los      |
Fühlst du dich hilflos, geh raus und hilf, los    | Wir sind Helden
Fühlst du dich machtlos, geh raus und mach, los   | 23.55: Alles auf Anfang
Fühlst du dich haltlos, such Halt und lass los    |


Reply to: