Re: Bug#791230: GCC5 transition and jessie-backports
2015-09-23 0:51 GMT+02:00 Matthias Klose <email@example.com>:
> On 22.09.2015 13:52, Bálint Réczey wrote:
>> jessie-bpo: libfooNv4
>> testing: libfooN (Breaks: libfooNv4; Replaces: libfooNv4)
>> I plan back-porting some affected packages but it would be nice if
>> Matthias and backports admins could agree on the best practice first
>> and add this to the transition documentation:
> you should differentiate two cases:
> - if just the library package was renamed, you should undo
> the v5 changes.
> - if you had a soname bump, you have to both change the
> jessie-bpo package, and add the breaks/replaces for
> unstable/testing. using the v4 suffix there seems to
> be sensible.
> Feel free to add a new section to the wiki page. Note that at least the
> gcc-5 packaging uses the gcc4-compatible ABI when built for jessie. So even
> if you decide to backport this one, the above changes are necessary.
I have added the notes at: