Re: Bug#799276: libnl-3-200: depends on libc6 version that doesn't exist in wheezy-backports
Am Donnerstag, 17. September 2015, 15:23:36 schrieb Heiko Stübner:
> Am Donnerstag, 17. September 2015, 14:03:52 schrieben Sie:
> > Package: libnl-3-200
> > Version: 3.2.24-2~bpo70+1
> > Severity: grave
> > Justification: renders package unusable
> > Dear Maintainer,
> > I am trying to install keepalived from wheezy-backports on amd64, using:
> > apt-get -t wheezy-backports install keepalived
> > This returns the following error:
> > The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> > libnl-3-200 : Depends: libc6 (>= 2.14) but 2.13-38+deb7u8 is to be
> > installed
> > E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.
> > Checking dependencies for current libnl-3-200 version in
> > wheezy-backports (3.2.24-2~bpo70+1), I see:
> > Depends: libc6 (>= 2.14)
> > However, the most recent libc6 version available is 2.13-38+deb7u8.
> > Since https://packages.debian.org/wheezy-backports/libnl-3-200 shows:
> > dep: libc6 (>= 2.13) [s390x]
> > Embedded GNU C Library: Shared libraries
> > also a virtual package provided by libc6-udeb
> > dep: libc6 (>= 2.13-28) [armhf]
> > dep: libc6 (>= 2.14) [amd64]
> > dep: libc6 (>= 2.8) [not amd64, armhf, ia64, s390x]
> > I am guessing either libc6 >= 2.14 needs to be ported to
> > wheezy-backports, or the amd64 dependency should be changed to a lower
> > version.
> I guess we'll need to ask Sandro about this dependency, as he is one who did
> the backports build.
> I have so far never touched the *-backports at all, so don't really know how
> that works.
the bug above got reported against libnl-3, but meaning the backported version
in wheezy-backports. I just read up that backport-related bugs should be
reported to the debian-backports list (included), also see the original