Re: CMake 3.0.2 for wheezy-backport
On 07/04/15 15:21, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
> Unfortunately this brings back #760823, I don't know if this is
> an issue for backports.
> Well, it should at least be solved by some other means, like some stuff in
I tried, but I could not find a way...
>> Also I'm not sure if I should mention that this is a NMU in the
>> changelog and/or in the version number.
> Not an NMU, you are taking the responsability of maintaining the backport for
> it's lifespan.
> That being said, we are very near Jessie now, is it really worth the effort?
Perhaps you are right, I was hoping that the backport was just a matter
of rebuilding, but since there are issues, I think it's not worth