Am Mittwoch, 19. November 2014, 17:17:34 schrieb David Prévot: > Hi, Hi David, > Le 19/11/2014 11:52, Mike Gabriel a écrit : > > On Di 18 Nov 2014 20:42:21 CET, Hakan Siktas wrote: > >> Do you have an advise for us, who already are using the ownCloud > >> backport? > > > > Personally, I would add Debian jessie APT sources to my APT > > configuration […] > > > > and then remove Debian jessie from APT again (or do proper APT pinning). > > A proper APT pinning is IMHO highly preferable. It could be a three > lines file like: > > $ cat /etc/apt/preferences.d/testing > Package: * > Pin: release a=testing > Pin-Priority: 150 This is no proper pinning for machines that use wheezy-backports package cause it will upgrade all wheezy-backports packages to jessie, as wheezy-backports is priority 100. For example would it update btrfs-tools and initramfs-tools for backport kernel to Jessie and this gives me: serious Fehler von initramfs-tools (0.115~bpo70+1 -> 0.116) <ungelöst> #766920 - initramfs-tools: update-initramfs makes system unbootable due to missing rootfs Without reviewing this bug I won´t to this upgrade. So I tried: Package: * Pin: release a=testing Pin-Priority: 150 Package: * Pin: release a=wheezy-backports Pin-Priority: 200 But then I get this: mondschein:~> LANG=C apt-get dist-upgrade Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Calculating upgrade... Done The following NEW packages will be installed: libaudit0 libcryptsetup4 libpam-systemd libsystemd-daemon0 libsystemd- id128-0 libsystemd-journal0 libsystemd-login0 systemd 0 upgraded, 8 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 1487 kB/1765 kB of archives. After this operation, 4573 kB of additional disk space will be used. Do you want to continue [Y/n]? ^C mondschein:~> LANG=C aptitude dist-upgrade No packages will be installed, upgraded, or removed. 0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 0 B of archives. After unpacking 0 B will be used. And this doesn´t make any sense at all to me. I could file a bug about this, but as such a setup would not be an official supported one anyway, I do not see much sense. Maybe I´d need apt from Jessie for this to work? So no Jessie owncloud on my machine until I migrate the machine to Jessie completely or I have sorted out above issue, as I do not feel like running systemd on a mixture of Jessie and Wheezy. I would really prefer having a backport Owncloud without that mediaelement build dependency. It may deviate, but the package is there already and removing it creates issues for those users that have installed it. I don´t know how many they are, but for me it was an obvious choice over a 3rd party repository. Is it really that important to have the backports package match exactly on that media element build dependency. Is such a mixed wheezy/jessie setup really preferable over a backport that fits well within wheezy? At least to my findings about such a mixed setup appears to be highly experimental and even a full jessie upgrade might be preferable. I also get the impression there is some animonisity between you and Mike and I would rather see some constructive discussion on how this situation can be solved in a way that would both be acceptable for you and for Mike, that would both be acceptable for Jessie and for Wheezy Backport needs. I really appreciate Mike´s work on the backport as it made Owncloud nicely accessible on my Wheezy based server. Ciao, -- Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.