On Wed, 15 Oct 2014 20:34:53 Michael Tokarev wrote: > > Building backport should be trivial as it needs no changes. I shall be > > happy to backport in about two weeks from now if everything goes well. > > Are you sure about this? Previous backport didn't work, see > https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=ceph&suite=wheezy-backports I'm not sure if I can recognise a problem... > and no one looked at it for 83 days already. I don't understand what's wrong... > Will the next > attempt to backport it be handled the same way with no changes > as you're saying, making just yet another useless noize? I'm afraid so unless you (or someone else) will help... -- All the best, Dmitry Smirnov.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.