Re: Request: bump libav to v10?

[Bálint Réczey <balint@balintreczey.hu>]

2014-05-28 15:17 GMT+07:00 Micha Lenk <micha@debian.org>:
> Hi,
>
>
> On 28.05.2014 05:43, Bálint Réczey wrote:
>>>
>>> Could anyone please bump the wheezy-backports package to version 10?
>>
>>
>> It would be nice if xbmcm then xbmc-pvr-addons could be accepted first
>> to let wheezy-backports have XBMC 12.3 with fully functional PVR
>> addons for a moment.
>
>
> Hmm, this sounds pretty much like wheezy-backports became a real release
> that would benefit of release management features like coordinated
> transitions. Backports FTP masters (formorer, rhonda), any thoughts?
>
> But, back to Bálint, as we do not have a time-based transition from
> where-ever, what do users gain by the "moment" of having XBMC 12.3?
The gain was right after the part you kept from my email. :-):
...
> to let wheezy-backports have XBMC 12.3 with fully functional PVR
> addons for a moment. This would allow people to stay with XBMC 12.3
> through using snapshots.d.o if they wish to.

Cheers,
Balint

PS: Snapshots.d.o is better than a private repository because the
packages there are signed by release keys.