[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: pdfcrack_0.12-1~bpo70+1_amd64.changes REJECTED



On 03/03/14 07:44, Eriberto wrote:
> Thanks Dererk! Only for my apprenticeship, what's thr problem?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Eriberto
>
>
> 2014-03-03 7:41 GMT-03:00 Dererk <dererk@debian.org>:
>> On 03/03/14 07:40, Eriberto wrote:
>>> Hi Alexander!
>>>
>>> What is '-v'?
>>>
>>> I remade my package now and it needn't modifications from original in
>>> testing. What can be the problem?
>>>
>>> Thanks for your help!
>>>
>>> Have a nice day.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Eriberto
>>>
>>>
>>> 2014-03-03 7:00 GMT-03:00 Alexander Wirt <debian-backports@lists.debian.org>:
>>>> Changes since stable missing in changes file. Did you forgot -v?
>>>>
>>>> ===
>>>>
>>>> Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
>>>> your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
>>>> concerns.
>>>>
>> It's something missing on my end, sorry. I'm currently reuploading them.
>>
>>
>> Sorry

Hi Eriberto!

The one Vincent has just explained a few seconds before on this list, on
summary, when you upload a package to backports you have to tell the
builder to include all logs since the last upload present on the archive
for the Stable release. Its not automatic and it has to be specified on
buildtime.

The tricky part is when you have to build a package from which you are
also uploading one of its dependencies at the same time. Since that
first package is not on the archive and because the builder is unable to
resolve that dependency by itself, you need to do some builder magic
hooking and such. In my case, did them but forgot to remind the builder
to pass the -v that was being mentioned in here.


Cheers,

Dererk

-- 
BOFH excuse #335:
the AA battery in the wallclock sends magnetic interference


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Reply to: