Re: Iceweasel in Squeeze and security
On 06/27/2013 06:08 AM, Paul van der Vlis wrote:
> On 26-06-13 21:38, Jens Schüßler wrote:
>
>> What is worse if you get right that 17.0.7esr-1~bpo60+1 through
>> deb http://mozilla.debian.net/ squeeze-backports iceweasel-esr
>> in your sources.list?
>>
>> What is the so unofficial part in the Debian Mozilla Maintainer Team that
>> I should not trust the packages from that repository, but the build from debian.org
>> repository, made by the very same people?
>
> I am sceptical when it's not on the official site for backports. Maybe
> it's completely automacally build without any testing.
>
> What's the reason not to put it on the official site when it's OK?
>
> Is the next step that we must get many backports from sites of the
> maintainers?
I really agree with you. The situation should be fixed IMO as well. And
probably a security announce should be published about the stop of
support for Iceweasel 3.x in old-stable.
Thomas
Reply to: