Re: Backport of schroot

[Reinhard Tartler <siretart@gmail.com>]

On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 10:34 PM, Roger Leigh <rleigh@codelibre.net> wrote:

> While I would ultimately like to put 1.6.4-3~bpo60+1 into
> backports, this is not currently advisable: the 1.6.x
> releases have not yet had extensive testing with the
> stable/stable-backports toolchain and library versions,
> while the 1.4.x releases have.  Additionally, there are
> some changes to the configuration file options (some
> additional and some deprecated and obsoleted options).

Can you elaborate on the problems with schroot 1.6.x in squeeze,
preferably by copying bug #688637, which I specifically requested for
that? I would be willing to test preview packages.

Thanks.

-- 
regards,
    Reinhard