[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [pkg-bacula-devel] Bacula 5.2.6+dfsg-5_bpo60+1 review & upload request



Ahoi!

On 30 September 2012 12:43, Luca Capello <luca@pca.it> wrote:
> Here I am, what better than a raining day for an upload?

Haha - welcome to my world.  Nothing like a rain to welcome you in the morning!

> -bacula (5.2.6+dfsg-5~bpo60+1) barts-squeeze-backports; urgency=low
> +bacula (5.2.6+dfsg-5~bpo60+1) squeeze-backports; urgency=low

Ah crap I forgot about this one - fixed that now.

> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
>  bacula-common : Depends: initscripts (>= 2.88dsf-13.3) but
> 2.88dsf-13.1+squeeze1 is to be installed
>  bacula-fd : Depends: initscripts (>= 2.88dsf-13.3) but
> 2.88dsf-13.1+squeeze1 is to be installed
> E: Broken packages
> mantissa:~#

Whoops - pretty embarrassing.  I fixed that in 5.2.6+dfsg-5~bpo60+2
(i.e reverted it back to use /var/run).  Please see
http://sultan.timedout.org/~bart/debian/barts-squeeze-backports/ again
as well as http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-bacula/bacula.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/debian/5.2.6%2Bdfsg-5_bpo60%2B2
tag.

I *did* check the installation in chroot this time :) and it installed
fine (bacula-fd, bacula-sd…).  I've it running and simply upgraded
last time hence didn't spot that problem…

Let me know should you spot anything else.  But I reckon it should be
good to go now.


Reply to: