[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bacula 5.2.6+dfsg-5_bpo60+1 review & upload request

Hi there!

Bart, please always Cc: the pkg-bacula-devel@ mailing list ;-)

On Fri, 28 Sep 2012 13:30:22 +0200, Bart Swedrowski wrote:
> I'd like to ask for a review and upload of Bacula 5.2.6+dfsg-5_bpo60+1 packages.

Backports are permitted only for the same version which is in testing,
i.e. 5.2.6+dfsg-2, so we need to wait until 5.2.6+dfsg-5 enters that

> I've been resposible for the previous 5.2.6+dfsg-2_bpo60+1 preparation
> and testing.  Upload has been done by Luca however Luca is very busy
> at the moment and since there's quite a lot of important changes and
> fixes (one critical) I'd like to get this out as soon as possible
> really.

Here I am, what better than a raining day for an upload?

> I've been running this set of packages for a few days on my own Bacula
> installation without any problems.
> http://sultan.timedout.org/~bart/debian/barts-squeeze-backports/bacula_5.2.6+dfsg-5~bpo60+1_amd64.changes
> http://sultan.timedout.org/~bart/debian/barts-squeeze-backports/bacula_5.2.6+dfsg-5~bpo60+1.dsc
> If you'd like to test those you can try following APT sources:
> deb http://sultan.timedout.org/~bart/debian barts-squeeze-backports/

As usual, I was checking your packages against the ones I built locally
and other than the differences due to pbuilder with ext3/ext4/tmpfs
BUILDPLACE [1] there was the following one:
$ debdiff BART/bacula_5.2.6+dfsg-5~bpo60+1.dsc bacula_5.2.6+dfsg-5~bpo60+1.dsc
diffstat for bacula-5.2.6+dfsg bacula-5.2.6+dfsg

 changelog |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff -Nru bacula-5.2.6+dfsg/debian/changelog bacula-5.2.6+dfsg/debian/changelog
--- bacula-5.2.6+dfsg/debian/changelog  2012-09-25 15:56:01.000000000 +0200
+++ bacula-5.2.6+dfsg/debian/changelog  2012-09-30 12:57:34.000000000 +0200
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-bacula (5.2.6+dfsg-5~bpo60+1) barts-squeeze-backports; urgency=low
+bacula (5.2.6+dfsg-5~bpo60+1) squeeze-backports; urgency=low

   [ Bart Swedrowski ]
   * Rebuild for squeeze-backports.

[1] <mid:87ehmbaw6y.fsf@gismo.pca.it>

The above means that I can not upload your packages and thus I was
testing on a real squeeze the ones I had built locally [2], however:
mantissa:~# apt-get -t gismo-squeeze-backports install bacula-common bacula-fd
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:

The following packages have unmet dependencies:
 bacula-common : Depends: initscripts (>= 2.88dsf-13.3) but 2.88dsf-13.1+squeeze1 is to be installed
 bacula-fd : Depends: initscripts (>= 2.88dsf-13.3) but 2.88dsf-13.1+squeeze1 is to be installed
E: Broken packages

[2] deb http://people.debian.org/~gismo/debian gismo-squeeze-backports/

That dependency was introduced for the /var/run -> /run migration [3].
Bart, I would suggest to start from 5.2.6+dfsg-2 and backport the
relevant security fixes (or if you prefer to undo the /run migration).

[3] <http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-bacula/bacula.git;a=commitdiff;h=eaf6744f799c165bc891fde8bf520adb147a4dbb>

Thx, bye,
Gismo / Luca

Attachment: pgpGxAPQKW981.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: