no mails from bpo since move to b.d.o
Hi, again,
I *think* that since the move of bpo from bp.o to b.d.o, but
definitively for the last two uploads (see below), I have not
gotten *any* mails.
These are the uploads (all times UTC):
-rw-r--r-- 1 tg tg 364 Jan 2 22:38 mksh_40.4-2~bpo50+1_amd64.bpo.upload
-rw-r--r-- 1 tg tg 3893 Jan 2 22:33 mksh_40.4-2~bpo50+1_amd64.changes
-rw-r--r-- 1 tg tg 364 Jan 2 22:38 mksh_40.4-2~bpo60+1_amd64.bpo.upload
-rw-r--r-- 1 tg tg 3600 Jan 2 22:34 mksh_40.4-2~bpo60+1_amd64.changes
I’ve checked my mail server logs from around that time and
the greylisting database and find no entries.
http://lists.debian.org/debian-backports-changes/2012/01/maillist.html
moreover shows two “Processing” mails which I know from regular Debian
uploads (but never got from b.d.o), but neither an ACCEPTED nor REJECTED
and the uploads don’t show up on buildd.d.o either.
I would really like to know what’s going on (both with the mail and the
uploaded packages) and get this mail problem fixed. Am I the only one
getting neither Processing nor ACCEPTED/REJECTED mails for his uploads?
The *.changes have:
| Maintainer: Thorsten Glaser <tg@mirbsd.de>
| Changed-By: Thorsten Glaser <tg@mirbsd.de>
The files are signed with 0xE99007E0 which has been in the backports
keyring even when I was only a DM, and one of its four (three valid)
uids is exactly that string. (ISTR there were some initial issues
with the comment field on my primary uid being larger than the soft-
ware expected, but AFAIHH you fixed that… didn’t you?)
Hope to hear from y’all soon,
//mirabilos
--
Sometimes they [people] care too much: pretty printers [and syntax highligh-
ting, d.A.] mechanically produce pretty output that accentuates irrelevant
detail in the program, which is as sensible as putting all the prepositions
in English text in bold font. -- Rob Pike in "Notes on Programming in C"
Reply to: