[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Accepted dkms 2.1.1.2-5~bpo50+1 (source all)



Hi Holger,

On Tuesday 04 October 2011 16:02:43 Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Montag, 26. September 2011, Jan Wagner wrote:
> > Source: dkms
> > Binary: dkms
> > Architecture: source all
> > Version: 2.1.1.2-5~bpo50+1
> > Distribution: lenny-backports
> 
> your backport is broken:
> 
> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
>   dkms: Depends: coreutils (>= 7.4) but 6.10-6 is to be installed

thanks for your feedback. Thats unfortunately true. I didn't doublecheck the 
package, as most of my systems migrated over to squeeze, sorry.

> I'm not sure backporting coreutils is the right approach...

I contacted Giuseppe, if it is a good idea to lower the required coreutils 
version for lenny, but no answer yet.

Sorry for the inconveniences, Jan.
-- 
Never write mail to <waja@spamfalle.info>, you have been warned!
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GIT d-- s+: a C+++ UL++++ P+ L+++ E--- W+++ N+++ o++ K++ w--- O M V- PS PE Y++
PGP++ t-- 5 X R tv- b+ DI D+ G++ e++ h---- r+++ y++++ 
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Reply to: