Johannes, you are talking about the mozilla.debian.net backports, right?I share your thoughts about the l10n packages. After getting an upgrade through backports, always a check for l10n consistency is needed, and should always be installed from the unstable or experimental repo's.
Backporting the applicable l10n packages would be great! Roel Op 02-10-11 17:03, Johannes Rohr schreef:
It is nice that icedove is being backported (although not the latest version yet), but I suppose that it is not a rare case that it is installed together with iceowl-extension (Lightning) and calendar-google-provider. Since the version dependency is strict, wouldn't it be possible to have these backported as well? And what is also missing, both for iceweasel and icedove, are the l10n packages. I suppose backporting these should require little effort.. Thanks, Johannes