[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Backport of bacula 5.0.3



Hi Pietro,

On Tue, 2011-08-09 at 10:16 +0200, Pietro Bertera wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 8:40 AM, Alexander Wirt <formorer@formorer.de> wrote:
> 
> > You shouldn't assume things. Especially not for important packages like
> > bacula. Did you get in touch with rhonda before (he did the backport in
> > lenny). There is also the problem that we expect package maintainers in bpo
> > to be experienced debian packagers, that is the reason why I discourage the
> > current practice of some DD's to just sponsoring everything that comes by to
> > backports.
> >
> > I'll talk to my fellow ftpmaster collegue about this topic.
> >
> > Alex
> >
> 
> I'm not a debian developer. I followed the instructions here:
> http://backports-master.debian.org/Contribute/
> If you think it's a good thing I will maintain the package for debian
> backports. Otherwise I will keep the package only on my servers.

Thanks! I'll be happy to support you in case there's any questions as
I'll be using the package for myself too. So don't hesitate to ask me if
you need any help!

-- 
Best regards,
Kilian

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: