[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Backports of glib2.0, network-manager, and wpasupplicant



Hi,

Am Donnerstag, den 29.12.2011, 16:29 +0100 schrieb Alexander Wirt:
> W. Martin Borgert schrieb am Thursday, den 29. December 2011:
> > I need squeeze backports of the current testing versions
> > of the packages glib2.0, network-manager, and wpasupplicant.
> > If somebody likes to do this, I'm happy. If not, I will try
> > my luck. Any comments?
>
> glib is one of those packages with a very big impact. Therefore I would
> either prefer no backport, or at least one of the regular glib maintainers.

having a glib backport would make a filetea backport much more likely;
this adds to one side of the “worth-the-effort” consideration.

I don’t know if filetea requires he MIME system, though.

Greetings,
Joachim

-- 
Joachim "nomeata" Breitner
Debian Developer
  nomeata@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C
  JID: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: