On Wed, 09 Nov 2011 18:03:55 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net> wrote:
> On 04.11.2011 15:33, Manuel Holtgrewe wrote:
>> I would like to have trac 0.12 as a squeeze backport.
>
> This sounds great to me, and i can only encourage it.
I just stumbled across #644401 (no translations for trac, which is a
shame since the localization feature is one of the big advantages of
trac 0.12), and provided a patch for it.
However, that patch requires python-babel >= 0.9.5 as a
build-dependency, and that version isn't in squeeze.
So i'm considering backporting python-babel to squeeze-backports, unless
there are any objections. It seems to work fine for me, fwiw.
Is there any reason i should hesitate to upload python-babel
0.9.6-1~bpo1 to squeeze-backports in preparation for the fix to #644401?
--dkg
Attachment:
pgpzK48HaUNy3.pgp
Description: PGP signature